COVID-19 A Clear Case of Racketeering?

Nothing Novel about Covid-19. All of its puzzle pieces are part of patents made before 2019. So why did they tell us it was Novel? And why did they change the definition of Vaccine? Dr. David Martin lays out the case in this compelling, must watch video.

Dr. David Martin of M·CAM | Aligning Innovation with Value Exchange ( and many other companies.

M-CAM cataloged and digitzed all patents that were previously all in a paper-based library and very difficult to search through. Once completed, Dr. Martin’s team had full access and ability to scan patents in ways not possible before. It became clear to them shortly after this project was completed that things were not right in the pharmaceutical and public health sciences sector.

Using the EUA (Emergency Use Authorization), courtesy of the Covid Pandemic, to avoid any scrutiny or liability, they introduced their product to the masses as a panacea. They hoped to ride that wave, completely protected, all the way to the Children’s Vaccine Registry and punch a lifetime ticket to the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, where Pharmaceutical Companies pay a small stipend into the pot to settle nominal injury claims.

Of course, this only applies if they aren’t found to have committed crimes when bringing their product to market.

Their ultimate goal, create the Perception of a Need so they can insert their solution.

It helps when the Federal Government funds it’s Covid Marketing campaign with $1 Billion to pay news agencies and influencers to help sell the need for your product while simultaneously writing mandates that demand you take said product. It becomes a no lose proposition, except for the taxpayer.

Covid-19 Fear would allow them the opportunity needed to introduce the public to a gene therapy they knew there was no appetite for.

Dr. David Martin – “You need to create the illusion of demand. And there is nothing that does a better job of creating the illusion of demand than the urgency of the event you’ve manufactured.”

“This was not a public health crisis. This was an opportunistic marketing campaign to address a stated objective. And that’s why this is Occam’s Razor. It’s the easiest thing to describe because they’re the ones that said it. The reality is they said they needed to get the public to accept a pan-corona virus vaccine counter measure. And they needed the media to create the hype and investors would follow where they see profit. You do not have anything else you need to rely on to explain the events of the last 20 months than the actual statement of the actual perpetrator.”

They needed the public to ‘understand a need’ so they could then introduce the solution, that had been unsuccessful in the past. We had to need it, in an emergency so that it would not be scrutinized. From this, they could then begin to introduce their regular injections.

In this talk he covered what they’ve found in the Corona Virus Family and it’s related products. He’s been trying to blow the whistle since Anthrax in 2002.

“We have reviewed the over 4,000 patents that have been issued around SARS Coronavirus. And we have done a very comprehensive review of the financing of all of the manipulations of Corona Virus which gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the Beta Corona Virus Family. “

He took the purportedly novel gene sequence of the corona virus and reviewed those against thepatent records that were available as of the spring of 2020 and what they found are over 120 patented pieces of evidence that the declaration of a novel corona virus is entire fallacy. In the records there were sequences in patents going back to 1999.

He takes us on a short journey through the patent landscape so we understand. The first vaccine ever sought for a coronavirus was initially sought by Pfizer 1/28/2000, a canine corona virus vaccine.

“Fauci funded research at the University of Chapel Hill in 2002 – The NIAID built an infectious replication-defective corona virus that was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium.

In other words, we made SARS and we patented it on 4/19/2002, before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia, which as you know followed that by several months.”

Patent 7279327. That patent clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing, the fact that ACE receptor the ACE2 binding domain, the S1 Spike protein, and other elements that we have come to know as this scourge pathogen was not only ENGINEERED, but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or in intermediate of the pathogen. And that technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could actually harness corona virus as a vector to distribute HIV Vaccine.”

And it goes on from there each segment more shocking than the next. If you want to understand how they can hide the science in plain sight, this is a must listen.

Sadly, this vaccine has never been shown to demonstrate any protection against the Corona Virus. So, if it’s not a vaccine and doesn’t protect against the virus, what is the point, beyond getting the public to accept gene therapy injections as vaccines? That’s a topic for another discussion. It’s important that we understand how it was allowed to happen.

Dr. Peter Daszak stated it well in 2015, “We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-corona virus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”

mRNA Vaccines (unproven) is their ‘solution’

“Ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy.  I always like to say if we had surveyed two years ago in the public would you be willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.  I think this (convenient) pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to innovation in the way that was not possible before.”

When we listen to Pfizer CEO Bourla tell us that they had no experience with mRNA and yet still that was the path they chose to inject the globe with, in an emergency. All by chance, even instinct, it seems a little disingenuous. More rational is the possibility that they had been waiting to utilize, and test broadly, this new technology that they wanted people to embrace, en masse, as they have 10 more ‘solutions’ waiting in the wings, using this technology that they can now define under the protective umbrella of vaccine (it’s gene therapy, if it’s therapy at all.) Genius!

To learn more about demanding justice and taking action you can visit /// PROSECUTE NOW, by Dr. David Martin. You can also visit the Lawfare page on this site for further information. Anything is legally if we don’t hold them accountable. Our freedom is in our hands, for now.

Learn More About:

Legal Advocacy for Medical Freedoms | Patient Advocacy Tools | Effective Remedies

Help us educate and advocate by sharing this article today!

More on Crimes Against Humanity

More News by Category

Hands for Health and Freedom

21001 N Tatum Blvd #1630-445 Phoenix, AZ 85050

We need your support to save lives and restore freedoms through education and advocacy.